Neuteronomy 25: 11-12 "If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity."
Deuteronomy's 25th chapter seems to be about justice. The first part is basically saying, if two men have a dispute, take it to court. The judges will acquit the innocent and condemn the guilty. Makes sense. This method of justice survives to this day. The following part doesn't seem to. If the guilty man needs to be beaten, the judge will make him take 40 lashes. One for every night and day it rained on the ark, one for each year the Israelites were in the wilderness. One for every day the scouts were in the promised land. One for each day Moses was on the mountain...you get me. Forty.
But more than forty is degrading. More than forty is outside that perfect, recurring number forty. More than forty is unjust...too much.
Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain. OK. Why this random animal rights law in the middle of the human justice laws? I had to consider this a little more than surface level. An ox's job is to drag the millstone over the grain, crushing it. Thats a lot of work. To muzzle it is to keep it's mouth closed, preventing it from eating any of the grain. Why would God want men to allow oxen to eat some of the grain? Its got to be more than just animal rights though.
Verses 5-10 are about family justice, and continuing a family line. I was wondering about why the widow of a dead man could not remarry outside of the family. In fact, that widow was required to marry the brother of the dead man, bear him children, so that the dead man's line could continue. If the brother wasn't into this deal, she could take him to the elders who would try to talk him into it. If that wasn't working, she could take of his sandal (in my head, I see her chasing him down, wrestling him to the ground, taking off his sandal) and spit in his face. What a grave insult it must have been to not carry on your brother's line and reject his grieving widow to warrant God allowing her to spit in his face. I wonder if this was the widow's only shot at at childbearing...the Bible doesn't say...only that his widow must not marry outside the family.
Weird that if two dudes are fighting, the wife of one could not run up and grab the other guys nuts. She was to have her hand cut off because of it. What the heck? She's trying to protect her husband. But this makes me think guys have to settle their dust ups on their own. Is it about the "dishonor" of having a woman come in and "handle"...."things?" Or is it about having two intact balls (so he could keep going to church)? I don't know.
Having differing weights for trade is lame. What kind of terrible person would do that? That blows. It's dishonest and unjust. God detests that because of His being so perfectly just.
Then God orders them to blot the memory of the Amalekites out from under heaven. That's justice, since the Amalekites apparently pestered the Israelites in their wandering. Where have we heard that before?
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I think, actually, that you're pretty well spot-on about the grabbing the stones thing—she was essentially deciding that he wasn't allowed to worship with the congregation anymore. It doesn't say anything about her punching his eyes out or anything.
And I know you're not going forward if you can help it, but don't forget that business about the ox and grain when you get to 1 Corinthians.
And I laughed pretty hard at neuteronomy.
Post a Comment